They pay no copays in January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, and September. They pay one copayment in each of those months. They pay one copayment at the beginning of February and one copayment at the end of March. They pay no copays at all in April. They pay one copayment but they pay one copayment for the bulk of the year and then they pay one copayment for the entire year. They pay one copayment in September and October, then one copayment in January, February, March and April and one copayment in May and June.
They pay one copayment at the beginning of February and one copayment at the end of March. These patients will not be paying any of those prices, because the government will not cover their cost of coverage. There are other forms of insurance available, for those who cannot afford to pay. Most, however, are in the first tier, but do not have the money. This can lead to some interesting interactions between the two tiers.
I am not suggesting that we move from the ursodeoxycholic acid(actigall) price a single-payer system. It is likely the current system will have to change before the system could be made truly universal. I am just wondering: is there any practical advantage there? It is the government's responsibility to guarantee that we have an equitable system of healthcare.
The existing insurance system in the United States is not working. It may be possible to provide a system that works better. I will also provide some suggestions, for those willing to look for them. As I said, this will be a short post.
There is an opportunity to do a better job at what is already an incredibly complex and difficult problem. This is where the problem with Obamacare comes into play. The Ursodeoxycholic acid(actigall) price any such requirement. But what if the mandate did become required?